Stebbins High School
1900 Harshman Rd
Dayton OH, 45424, Montgomery County
Phone: 937-237-4250
Ranking: (586 out of 821, bottom 29%)*
Type: Regular High School
Status: Currently Operational
Grade: Grade 9 to Grade 12
School District: Mad River Local School District
Title I Eligible School: Yes School-Wide Title I: NA
Magnet: NA
Charter: NA
Shared-Time School: NA
Students and Teachers
2013-2014 | 2012-2013 | 2011-2012 | 2010-2011 | 2009-2010 | 2008-2009 | 2007-2008 | ||||||||
Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | Amount | % | |
Total Teachers: | 66 | 63 | 74 | 72 | 72 | 71 | 70 | |||||||
Total Students: | 1,142 | 1,103 | 1,126 | 1,108 | 1,135 | 1,112 | 1,157 | |||||||
Grade 9: | 313 | 27.4% | 284 | 25.7% | 307 | 27.3% | 240 | 21.7% | 304 | 26.8% | 293 | 26.3% | 325 | 28.1% |
Grade 10: | 281 | 24.6% | 295 | 26.7% | 248 | 22.0% | 313 | 28.2% | 278 | 24.5% | 292 | 26.3% | 296 | 25.6% |
Grade 11: | 306 | 26.8% | 237 | 21.5% | 313 | 27.8% | 259 | 23.4% | 291 | 25.6% | 262 | 23.6% | 293 | 25.3% |
Grade 12: | 242 | 21.2% | 287 | 26.0% | 257 | 22.8% | 296 | 26.7% | 262 | 23.1% | 264 | 23.7% | 243 | 21.0% |
Ungraded: | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Student By Gender: | ||||||||||||||
Male: | 585 | 51.2% | 556 | 50.4% | 569 | 50.5% | 560 | 50.5% | 580 | 51.1% | 577 | 51.9% | 593 | 51.3% |
Female: | 557 | 48.8% | 547 | 49.6% | 557 | 49.5% | 548 | 49.5% | 506 | 44.6% | 491 | 44.2% | 521 | 45.0% |
Student By Races: | ||||||||||||||
American Indian/Alaska Native: | 3 | 0.3% | 3 | 0.3% | 4 | 0.4% | 7 | 0.6% | 7 | 0.6% | 5 | 0.4% | 7 | 0.6% |
Asian: | 19 | 1.7% | 18 | 1.6% | 16 | 1.4% | 18 | 1.6% | 26 | 2.3% | 26 | 2.3% | 19 | 1.6% |
Hispanic: | 48 | 4.2% | 46 | 4.2% | 41 | 3.6% | 33 | 3.0% | 32 | 2.8% | 34 | 3.1% | 34 | 2.9% |
Black: | 106 | 9.3% | 106 | 9.6% | 126 | 11.2% | 117 | 10.6% | 112 | 9.9% | 107 | 9.6% | 110 | 9.5% |
White: | 900 | 78.8% | 871 | 79.0% | 882 | 78.3% | 877 | 79.2% | 917 | 80.8% | 904 | 81.3% | 948 | 81.9% |
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander: | 2 | 0.2% | 4 | 0.4% | 6 | 0.5% | 10 | 0.9% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Two or More Races: | 64 | 5.6% | 55 | 5.0% | 51 | 4.5% | 46 | 4.2% | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
Lunch Program: | ||||||||||||||
Free Lunch Program Eligible: | 545 | 47.7% | 481 | 43.6% | 463 | 41.1% | 435 | 39.3% | 404 | 35.6% | 360 | 32.4% | NA | NA |
Reduced-Price Lunch Program Eligible: | 120 | 10.5% | 148 | 13.4% | 117 | 10.4% | 90 | 8.1% | 135 | 11.9% | 105 | 9.4% | NA | NA |
Student-Teacher Ratio: | 17.22 | 17.58 | 15.23 | 15.37 | 15.78 | 15.80 | 16.50 |
Test Performance
Year | Test | Grade | Measurement | Score | School District | State Average |
OGT | ||||||
2004 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 68.3% | 68.3% | 84.5% |
2005 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.4% | 78.4% | 81.6% |
2006 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.6% | 84.8% | 82.7% |
2007 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.6% | 80.9% | 81% |
2008 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.1% | 75.3% | 79% |
2009 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81.3% | 81.4% |
2010 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.7% | 75.7% | 80.4% |
2011 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 77.3% | 77.3% | 82.6% |
2012 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.4% | 86.4% | 82.6% |
2013 | Math | 10th Grade | % met std | 82.2% | 82.4% | 83.3% |
2004 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 56.8% | 56.8% | 95.7% |
2005 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 92% |
2006 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 90% | 90.2% | 89.4% |
2007 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 89.9% | 90.1% | 86.7% |
2008 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.8% | 85.2% |
2009 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.7% | 84.7% | 84.5% |
2010 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 84.8% | 84.8% | 83% |
2011 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.2% | 85.2% | 87.2% |
2012 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.0% | 86.0% | 86% |
2013 | Reading | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.3% | 86.4% | 87.6% |
2005 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63.4% | 63.4% | 73% |
2006 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 72.9% | 73.4% | 73.1% |
2007 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71% | 71.4% | 72.1% |
2008 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 65.3% | 65.5% | 72.8% |
2009 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.4% | 74.4% | 76% |
2010 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 64.8% | 64.6% | 73% |
2011 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 63% | 63% | 74.7% |
2012 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 71.4% | 71.4% | 81.6% |
2013 | Science | 10th Grade | % met std | 74.5% | 74.8% | 77.2% |
2005 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.6% | 75.6% | 79.3% |
2006 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.8% | 81.1% | 79.5% |
2007 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 80.7% | 81% | 76% |
2008 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 78.5% | 78.7% | 78.4% |
2009 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.8% | 83.8% | 81.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 75.2% | 74.9% | 79.6% |
2011 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 76.2% | 76.2% | 80.1% |
2012 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 79.5% | 79.5% | 76.7% |
2013 | Social Studies | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.0% | 81.2% | 81.1% |
2005 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.7% | 85.7% | 83.7% |
2006 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 87.7% | 88% |
2007 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.9% | 86.1% | 89.3% |
2008 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 83.3% | 83.5% | 85.2% |
2009 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 90.8% | 90.8% | 89.7% |
2010 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 81.3% | 81% | 84.1% |
2011 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 86.5% | 86.5% | 89.5% |
2012 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.8% | 85.8% | 87.1% |
2013 | Writing | 10th Grade | % met std | 85.1% | 85.3% | 84.9% |
2007 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 88.8% |
2008 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.9% | 88.2% |
2009 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.2% | 87.3% | 88.5% |
2010 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.3% | 90.3% | 89.2% |
2011 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 87% | 87% | 89.1% |
2012 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.1% | 89.9% |
2013 | Math | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.1% | 88.9% |
2007 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.9% | 92.9% | 92.8% |
2008 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 96.2% | 96.2% | 91.9% |
2009 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.1% | 92.2% | 92.8% |
2010 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 91.6% |
2011 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.3% | 94.3% | 92.4% |
2012 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.4% | 93.4% | 92.6% |
2013 | Reading | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | 92.9% |
2007 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.9% | 88.9% | 83.6% |
2008 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.8% | 87.9% | 83.6% |
2009 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 81.4% | 81.6% | 84.2% |
2010 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 85.6% | 85.6% | 85.1% |
2011 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 84.9% | 84.9% | 84.2% |
2012 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 82.4% | 82.4% | 87.8% |
2013 | Science | 11th Grade | % met std | 83.6% | 83.6% | 85.1% |
2007 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 90.6% | 87.6% |
2008 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.1% | 90.2% | 86.5% |
2009 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.9% | 91% | 88.6% |
2010 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 90.6% | 90.6% | 88.7% |
2011 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 89.1% | 89.1% | 88% |
2012 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 88.6% | 88.6% | 85.6% |
2013 | Social Studies | 11th Grade | % met std | 87.4% | 87.4% | 88.2% |
2007 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.4% | 92.4% | 93.4% |
2008 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 91.6% | 91.7% | 93% |
2009 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.6% | 94.7% | 93.2% |
2010 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.9% | 94.9% | 0% |
2011 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 94.7% | 94.7% | 93.4% |
2012 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 92.6% | 92.6% | 93% |
2013 | Writing | 11th Grade | % met std | 93.5% | 93.5% | 92.1% |
Some data by SchoolDigger.com.
* Stebbins High School was rated 3.5 out of 5 by USA.com. The ranking was calculated based on publically available historical Math and English performance data.